Monday, April 26, 2010
The New GM: Just as Shitty as the Old GM
GM's new advertising campaign would seem hysterically funny if it wasn't for the fact that they were lying to the American people, and using taxpayer's money to do it. In this commercial they tout the fact (as they see it) that they have repaid the loan given to them by the government five years ahead of schedule. In reality all that they have repaid is $6.7 billion dollars. The rest of the $52 billion went in to bailing them out, and allowed the government to take a large stake in the company. So basically, they repaid that loan of $6.7 billion with taxpayer money received from the sale of their stock to the federal government. Bravo. Wall Street accounting at its best, all used to dupe the American people into thinking that it was actually a good thing to bail them out and that they did right by "repaying" their loans. Sorry, GM. That loan wont be paid in full until the American people see a total of $52 billion, which is most likely not going to happen any time soon. In order for them to repay the rest of that loan, they would need to have an IPO price close to pretty successful companies such as McDonald's or Home Depot's market cap. Not happening. GM looks like it will remain Government Motors for a very long time, remain unprofitable, and all the while dupe the taxpayer into thinking GM is back and better than ever. Still the same shitty old GM.
Everybody Draw Mohammed Day
Leave it to the creators of South Park, yet again, to cause a stir on the premise of the First Amendment. Comedy Central's blind censorship of their latest episode and their lack of any type of obvious masculine genitalia for giving in to terrorists making threats over the internet has caused a back-lash of great proportions. One political cartoonist has called for May 20th to be recognized as "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" in order to execute her right to free speech. While she concedes that she never planned for her plan to go viral, it has now taken a life of its own with many bloggers and cartoonists vowing to participate. View the story here.
Excerpt:
After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."
Excerpt:
After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."
Programmed, Categorized and Easily Referenced
I think it is important, while we rail against Obama and Pelosi and Reid and Obamacare and Stimulus Plans and Big Government as a whole, that we remember that it shouldn't be just Democrats that we rail against. Right now they hold a majority in our government and decide with an iron will the direction of our country. But November will come along, and soon we will all remember how that evil Democratic Party screwed us all and we will move to place Republicans into the government and hail them as our saviors and expect things to get better from there. Some of us will blindly agree with everything that the Republican Party does and act as apologists for that party, but many of us will realize that the regime change that is coming is in fact no regime change at all. The Republicans, should they regain control of the legislature in some way, will in many cases be just as bad or even far worse than the Democrats. Instead of large spending packages devoted to social reform, we will begin to see large spending packages for corporate and military expansion. We will see the same old farm and oil and financial subsidies, the devotion to imperialistic interventions, the subjugation of the Bill of Rights in favor of heavy-handed policy against "terrorists", both foreign and domestic.
It is my great fear, that the epic force that is the Tea Party will begin to disappear should Republicans stage a dramatic come-back this fall, and everything that we have worked so hard to do, to make this government listen to the Will of the People, will disappear as people breathe a great sigh of relief and think things will suddenly get better from there on out.
But what we should do, is have a dramatic change of our definitions on these two parties. We are not Republican or Democrat. We are not liberal or conservative. We are not Big Government or Small Government.
What in fact we are, that divides us on a philosophical, economical and social plane of existence, are INDIVIDUALISTS and COLLECTIVISTS.
We need to realize that the largest parts of both parties, both Republican and Democratic, are limbs of the same creature. They are COLLECTIVISTS. They both believe that it is okay to take money from individuals and disperse it to other groups. They both think that this action is just, somehow, and we allow them to think that. But what we need to do, this November and for years to come, is not blindly vote the bums out, for what we will intentionally do is just vote other bums in and the whole process will begin to repeat itself.
What we need to do is change our definition of who we vote out, and say that they are bums not because they are Democrats, but because they are COLLECTIVISTS and they believe that it is okay to put a group of people, or a corporation, or a whole economic industry before the individual. Who we need to vote in, are not Republicans, for many of them are in fact COLLECTIVISTS in their own way. We need to vote for INDIVIDUALISTS who believe that the single unit of a person is more important than society as a whole, that the rights of the single person are more important than the rights of an artificially-created, arbitrary group of people.
And ultimately, Tea Partiers must realize that the Tea Party itself is not a group, is not a political party and should never be one. They must realize that they are simply INDIVIDUALS who are campaigning for the same thing and that is the recognition of their own individual rights over some unified idea that the Tea Party has become. We must not become shills of a political party. We must not become a political party unto ourselves. We should take heart in the fact that both parties are scared of us and that is because we refuse to be programmed, categorized, and easily referenced into a larger group that they can begin to quantify and manipulate.
That wont mean they wont try to categorize us. We are already racists and rich, white people, and crazy domestic terrorists. But ultimately we must fight back, and every chance we get we must assert that we are INDIVIDUALS.
So please, come November, and even (more importantly) before that as you run to the voting booths during primaries, don't blindly flick that switch for your simple run-of-the-mill Republican just because he isn't a Democrat. Flick the switch for someone who is an INDIVIDUALIST because he isn't a COLLECTIVIST.
It is my great fear, that the epic force that is the Tea Party will begin to disappear should Republicans stage a dramatic come-back this fall, and everything that we have worked so hard to do, to make this government listen to the Will of the People, will disappear as people breathe a great sigh of relief and think things will suddenly get better from there on out.
But what we should do, is have a dramatic change of our definitions on these two parties. We are not Republican or Democrat. We are not liberal or conservative. We are not Big Government or Small Government.
What in fact we are, that divides us on a philosophical, economical and social plane of existence, are INDIVIDUALISTS and COLLECTIVISTS.
We need to realize that the largest parts of both parties, both Republican and Democratic, are limbs of the same creature. They are COLLECTIVISTS. They both believe that it is okay to take money from individuals and disperse it to other groups. They both think that this action is just, somehow, and we allow them to think that. But what we need to do, this November and for years to come, is not blindly vote the bums out, for what we will intentionally do is just vote other bums in and the whole process will begin to repeat itself.
What we need to do is change our definition of who we vote out, and say that they are bums not because they are Democrats, but because they are COLLECTIVISTS and they believe that it is okay to put a group of people, or a corporation, or a whole economic industry before the individual. Who we need to vote in, are not Republicans, for many of them are in fact COLLECTIVISTS in their own way. We need to vote for INDIVIDUALISTS who believe that the single unit of a person is more important than society as a whole, that the rights of the single person are more important than the rights of an artificially-created, arbitrary group of people.
And ultimately, Tea Partiers must realize that the Tea Party itself is not a group, is not a political party and should never be one. They must realize that they are simply INDIVIDUALS who are campaigning for the same thing and that is the recognition of their own individual rights over some unified idea that the Tea Party has become. We must not become shills of a political party. We must not become a political party unto ourselves. We should take heart in the fact that both parties are scared of us and that is because we refuse to be programmed, categorized, and easily referenced into a larger group that they can begin to quantify and manipulate.
That wont mean they wont try to categorize us. We are already racists and rich, white people, and crazy domestic terrorists. But ultimately we must fight back, and every chance we get we must assert that we are INDIVIDUALS.
So please, come November, and even (more importantly) before that as you run to the voting booths during primaries, don't blindly flick that switch for your simple run-of-the-mill Republican just because he isn't a Democrat. Flick the switch for someone who is an INDIVIDUALIST because he isn't a COLLECTIVIST.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Happy Earth Day, libertarians!
Most people see Earth Day as a liberal, tree-hugger holiday where nutjobs chain themselves up to giant redwoods and place themselves in the way of giant chainsaws threatening to dice up Mother Earth's most valuable resources. I am proud to say that I am a tree-hugger, but I am in no way a liberal. Libertarianism and Earth Day go hand in hand, although I would think that we attack the problems of pollution and rampant resource gobbling a different way. Liberals would like to see big government come in with massive and invasive legislation that would protect the environment at the expense of the common man. The way I see it, it is in fact the other way around. Big government has a habit of handing the keys of the Earth-Destroyer 2000 to gigantic corporations, subsidized by tax-payer money.
The agricultural industry is one of the heaviest subsidized industries in the United States. It is this money that is used to drive the prices of our crops down, mostly corn here in the U.S. Cheap corn that doesn't reflect the natural supply/demand of the market is used to make cheap food. Over half of that unnaturally cheap corn that we grow is used for livestock feed. This unnaturally cheap feedstock is used to feed our cattle, which doesn't have to roam vast areas of grassland for food, and can be kept in unnaturally tiny corrals and fed an unnatural diet that ultimately kills them unnaturally, if they weren't going to be slaughtered any way. That unnatural diet gives rise to an unnatural amount of fat in the animal and also raises the E. coli in their guts to unnatural levels, that can eventually harm consumers who eat this unnatural meat and get unnaturally fat themselves. The unnatural amount of bacteria also winds up in the feces which makes its way into streams and rivers and lakes and can contaminate any crops in the area. It is why sometimes you hear of tomatoes and lettuce giving rise to E. coli outbreaks in the consumers who eat them. And since cattle doesn't have to roam for grass to eat, we can keep so much more of these large animals in tiny unnatural corrals which creates more feces lumped together in one area and can contaminate more land around them with the deadly (unnatural) amounts of bacteria.
The same is true for chickens and pigs. Our meat is made cheap and unhealthy for us by our government. If Michele Obama really wanted to stop obesity in our youth, she would go after these corporate subsidies that create the problem of unhealthy foods in the first place. And by doing so she would also be helping the environment and would allow our farms a more naturally ecological way of growing their crops and livestock. And the livestock would live in better conditions and live a more natural lifestyle. Before they were slaughtered. The fact remains that if libertarians and other champions of small government fight for less corporate welfare, we will stop enabling these multinational corporations from exploiting our land, resources and animals.
But a liberal who believes big government is the answer would say that the FDA needs more power to fight these corporations, that we need more bureaucracies to regulate the industries, that we need legislation that will force companies to comply with environmental standards. It's ironic that government subsidizes the destruction of our environment, and then creates environmental standards that companies need to follow in order to get more subsidies so that they can continue destroying the environment. It is a vicious circle that has no end.
But I digress. As an example of poor government programs at work, I point a big, unnaturally fat finger at the Energy Star program which has a great number of flaws. In short, it gives incentives to consumers to buy products that are supposedly energy efficient, but in many ways are not. In any government program there are loopholes and flaws that turn out to be more hazardous than helpful. Follow this link for a recent article on the Energy Star inefficiencies.
And then there is the oil industry and its obvious effects on our environment. Not only do we subsidize a lot of this industry, but there are also external costs involved. How much have we spent over the course of the last few decades, especially the last few years, on our interests in the Middle East? Sure we were "spreading democracy," as Bush said, but even the most ignorant ten year old can tell you that we were only involved so heavily with Iraq because of its oil reserves. How many billions of dollars have we spent on this war, and how many more billions are we going to spend in the future? All this to keep the oil flowing and to keep it relatively cheap for the American consumer. The oil market that we have now, like the agricultural one, is highly impacted by government involvement, whether it be a Republican or a Democratic administration. It's all the same. Do whatever you can to keep oil prices down so that Americans can buy their SUV's, and corporations can keep funneling subsidized oil into their subsidized industries. If we had never had these subsidies (and our imperialistic interventions over seas) the price of oil would likely be higher. Likely those prices would have risen gradually and our companies may have had the chance to look for alternate resources elsewhere, pouring money into solar and wind and other renewables in order to drive the costs of their energy usage down, maybe using our abundant natural gas reserves in the process as a stepping stone into truly cleaner energy. Instead, what we find ourselves risking, is the chance of a ginormous oil spike if Middle East events take a turn for the worst while we scramble about the world, place flags on ice caps, and drill for whatever drippings of black gold are left in the world. Our country and our industries are not prepared with the necessary infrastructure for a spike in oil. And all the while we devour and destroy our environment using tax-payer money.
So, listen all you fellow tree-huggers out there. If you want to protect the environment and the many different species of flora and fauna living in that environment, the best thing that you can do is end government's forays into the private sector. End corporate welfare. End our endless subsidization of unhealthy and destructive industrial sectors. Stop foreign imperialistic overtures overseas. Allow prices of commodities to fluctuate naturally with supply and demand. Allow man to live with the earth. Mother Earth hates big government too!
The agricultural industry is one of the heaviest subsidized industries in the United States. It is this money that is used to drive the prices of our crops down, mostly corn here in the U.S. Cheap corn that doesn't reflect the natural supply/demand of the market is used to make cheap food. Over half of that unnaturally cheap corn that we grow is used for livestock feed. This unnaturally cheap feedstock is used to feed our cattle, which doesn't have to roam vast areas of grassland for food, and can be kept in unnaturally tiny corrals and fed an unnatural diet that ultimately kills them unnaturally, if they weren't going to be slaughtered any way. That unnatural diet gives rise to an unnatural amount of fat in the animal and also raises the E. coli in their guts to unnatural levels, that can eventually harm consumers who eat this unnatural meat and get unnaturally fat themselves. The unnatural amount of bacteria also winds up in the feces which makes its way into streams and rivers and lakes and can contaminate any crops in the area. It is why sometimes you hear of tomatoes and lettuce giving rise to E. coli outbreaks in the consumers who eat them. And since cattle doesn't have to roam for grass to eat, we can keep so much more of these large animals in tiny unnatural corrals which creates more feces lumped together in one area and can contaminate more land around them with the deadly (unnatural) amounts of bacteria.
The same is true for chickens and pigs. Our meat is made cheap and unhealthy for us by our government. If Michele Obama really wanted to stop obesity in our youth, she would go after these corporate subsidies that create the problem of unhealthy foods in the first place. And by doing so she would also be helping the environment and would allow our farms a more naturally ecological way of growing their crops and livestock. And the livestock would live in better conditions and live a more natural lifestyle. Before they were slaughtered. The fact remains that if libertarians and other champions of small government fight for less corporate welfare, we will stop enabling these multinational corporations from exploiting our land, resources and animals.
But a liberal who believes big government is the answer would say that the FDA needs more power to fight these corporations, that we need more bureaucracies to regulate the industries, that we need legislation that will force companies to comply with environmental standards. It's ironic that government subsidizes the destruction of our environment, and then creates environmental standards that companies need to follow in order to get more subsidies so that they can continue destroying the environment. It is a vicious circle that has no end.
But I digress. As an example of poor government programs at work, I point a big, unnaturally fat finger at the Energy Star program which has a great number of flaws. In short, it gives incentives to consumers to buy products that are supposedly energy efficient, but in many ways are not. In any government program there are loopholes and flaws that turn out to be more hazardous than helpful. Follow this link for a recent article on the Energy Star inefficiencies.
And then there is the oil industry and its obvious effects on our environment. Not only do we subsidize a lot of this industry, but there are also external costs involved. How much have we spent over the course of the last few decades, especially the last few years, on our interests in the Middle East? Sure we were "spreading democracy," as Bush said, but even the most ignorant ten year old can tell you that we were only involved so heavily with Iraq because of its oil reserves. How many billions of dollars have we spent on this war, and how many more billions are we going to spend in the future? All this to keep the oil flowing and to keep it relatively cheap for the American consumer. The oil market that we have now, like the agricultural one, is highly impacted by government involvement, whether it be a Republican or a Democratic administration. It's all the same. Do whatever you can to keep oil prices down so that Americans can buy their SUV's, and corporations can keep funneling subsidized oil into their subsidized industries. If we had never had these subsidies (and our imperialistic interventions over seas) the price of oil would likely be higher. Likely those prices would have risen gradually and our companies may have had the chance to look for alternate resources elsewhere, pouring money into solar and wind and other renewables in order to drive the costs of their energy usage down, maybe using our abundant natural gas reserves in the process as a stepping stone into truly cleaner energy. Instead, what we find ourselves risking, is the chance of a ginormous oil spike if Middle East events take a turn for the worst while we scramble about the world, place flags on ice caps, and drill for whatever drippings of black gold are left in the world. Our country and our industries are not prepared with the necessary infrastructure for a spike in oil. And all the while we devour and destroy our environment using tax-payer money.
So, listen all you fellow tree-huggers out there. If you want to protect the environment and the many different species of flora and fauna living in that environment, the best thing that you can do is end government's forays into the private sector. End corporate welfare. End our endless subsidization of unhealthy and destructive industrial sectors. Stop foreign imperialistic overtures overseas. Allow prices of commodities to fluctuate naturally with supply and demand. Allow man to live with the earth. Mother Earth hates big government too!
How to Identify GMOs
Any libertarian's struggles and outcries should not only focus on government and politicians, but also on companies that are monopolies and oligopolies, heavily subsidized by the federal government. The agricultural industry is one of these oligopolies where a few companies control the entire market of the United States. This video shows how to identify genetically modified organisms in your produce aisle. I am inclined to go test this out at my nearest supermarket, and heed this girl's advice. Besides, who can resist a pretty farm girl. :)
South Park vs Islam
For anyone who is a fan of South Park, you know that they are number one in trying to exercise their freedom of speech, whether it is making fun of celebrities (that's right Bono, you're a number two), or politicians, or even religious figures. In the current series of episodes they have struck out again against the idea that the Prophet Muhammad is unassailable and devoid of any type of criticism. In the Islamic world it is considered blasphemous to show the Prophet in any type of picture, painting or drawing, so South Park, who once did show Muhammad without any outcry from Muslim critics, now must hide him inside the costume of a big fluffy bear in order to portray him on T.V.
Well it seems that South Park has once again hit a nerve. They are now the focus of a radical Islamic group that has begun to threaten them. I just find it funny that in the latest episode they showed Buddha doing lines of coke, yet so far I haven't heard of any violent Buddhist radicals threatening to destroy the makers of South Park for the blasphemous depiction of their "Awakened One". Muslims need to chill out, relax, and gain a much needed sense of humor.
Read the story for a laugh.
Well it seems that South Park has once again hit a nerve. They are now the focus of a radical Islamic group that has begun to threaten them. I just find it funny that in the latest episode they showed Buddha doing lines of coke, yet so far I haven't heard of any violent Buddhist radicals threatening to destroy the makers of South Park for the blasphemous depiction of their "Awakened One". Muslims need to chill out, relax, and gain a much needed sense of humor.
Read the story for a laugh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
